Menu

Hughes Center Blog

Featured Story

Equipping Urban Farms to Harvest Rainwater

Baby oysters held in hands

New Research Helps Remote Setters Produce Oysters More Efficiently

Every year, billions of oysters are planted in Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay. Most begin their lives in a hatchery and go through a remote setting process where microscopic oyster larvae attach to cleaned oyster shells before the spat on shell are placed on Bay bottom to grow.

Spat on shell producers have long known that the process is unpredictable. Some shells end up with more than 50 oysters attached, while others get none. In addition, larvae settle heavier on shells at the bottom of tanks compared to shells in the top and middle. Because producing one million spat on shell costs $3,500–$5,000 in materials and labor, that variability can become expensive and it can also affect oyster survival once planted in the Bay.

A recent applied research project set out to answer a deceptively basic question: where do oyster larvae settle when conducting remote setting — and can we improve it?

A closer look inside the tank

Funded by the Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology, research was conducted by Alex Golding with Ferry Cove Shellfish and Dr. Jill Bible with Washington College.

Researchers studied large “remote setting” tanks at the Ferry Cove Oyster Hatchery. Each tank holds containers filled with oyster shell. Mature oyster larvae are introduced and given several days to settle, distribute around the tank and transform into juvenile oyster spat.

To understand settlement patterns, scientists placed labeled sample shells throughout the tanks — at the top, middle, and bottom — and tracked how many oyster spat attached in each location.

They also tested two factors that remote setters can easily control: light (covered tanks vs. uncovered tanks) and aeration (high air flow vs. low air flow).

What they found

First, researchers confirmed something that hatchery staff and spat on shell producers had suspected for years: oyster larvae strongly prefer the bottom of the tank.

Researchers found that there are more oysters attached to shells at the bottom than to shells in the middle or top. Larvae naturally sink before setting, which helps explain the pattern — but the team wanted to know if traditional setting practices were making it worse, and what could be done to distribute it more evenly.

Light did not matter

Covering tanks with tarps — to simulate complete darkness, experienced at the bottom of the Bay — did not change where oysters settled. Larvae still concentrated at the bottom.

That finding is still useful. Covered tanks dramatically reduced biofouling (organisms growing inside the tank), meaning less cleaning was required between sets resulting in lower labor costs for growers.

Aeration did matter

Air flow, however, made a difference. In a high aeration environment, oysters still clustered at the bottom. However, in a low aeration environment, oyster larvae distributed much more evenly throughout the tank. The result was a more uniform vertical settlement of larvae across shells, on the top, middle, and bottom.

Why this matters

When too many oysters grow on the same shell, they compete for space and resources, reducing survival and harvest potential. Meanwhile, empty shells represent wasted resources.

By simply adjusting aeration levels, growers or producers may be able to:

  • improve survival rates.
  • increase harvest production.
  • reduce material costs.
  • enhance nutrient removal benefits from oysters in the Bay.

Even a modest improvement could save growers up to 20% in production costs.

What comes next?

This is the first time scientists have studied spat distribution in full-scale remote setting tanks, not just laboratory systems. The next step is repeating the trials and testing at other remote setting locations to confirm the results across different tank designs. The researchers will also continue to test other factors that impact oyster spat distribution with funding from the Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology.

Read the project’s final report here.

Past Blogs

Equipping Urban Farms to Harvest Rainwater

Man pointing to drip irrigation system

At a hands-on training hosted on June 24 at UMD’s Terp Farm in Upper Marlboro, people came together to explore how to safely harvest, treat, and use rainwater in urban agriculture, protecting both crops and consumers.

The project, headed by Rachel Rosenberg Goldstein, Assistant Professor at the UMD School of Public Health, explores how to integrate rainwater harvesting into urban agriculture safely. Rachel and the project’s research partners gathered people in the farming, nonprofit and academic community for a training session on incorporating urban rainwater harvesting and water treatment on their farms.

Urban agriculture is expanding across Maryland, but climate change makes rainfall less predictable. Farmers are facing longer stretches of drought punctuated by heavy downpours, making water access both limited and costly, especially in cities.

This project partly seeks to answer how small urban farms can create their own rainwater collection systems so excess rainfall can be stored and used in times of drought. Rainwater collection can result in possible biohazards – water flowing from roofs can bring contaminants like bird droppings, debris and other unwanted substances into the collected water. 

Concerns arise regarding the quality of the collected water when left untreated and used to water edible plants like vegetables and herbs and whether bacteria within untreated water could lead to foodborne illnesses. To offset this potential threat, Goldstein and her team are actively testing the success of different treatment and filtering methods versus using untreated water.

The training participants got a hands-on view of the existing rainwater collection systems and irrigation systems on the Terp Farm that were used in the project, as well as information on what was used in their water treatment and filtering processes. They also got to practice installing drip irrigation and watch a demonstration of a collection system from a rooftop.

Trainings like these help because “farmers like to build their own stuff and there are only so many contractors that work with small urban farms,” said Neith Little, a UMD Extension Agent specializing in urban agriculture who is partnering in the research on this project. This event marked a step in equipping Maryland’s urban farmers with practical tools and science-backed knowledge to manage and use rainwater sustainably.

Partners on this project include the University of Maryland School of Public Health, UMD Center for Food Safety and Security Systems, UMD Environmental Finance Center, UMD Extension, the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station Upper Marlboro Facility, and Plantation Park Heights Urban Farm. The Hughes Center partially funds this study.