![]() |
|
FAMILY AND CONSUMER SCIENCES - MCE OFFICE Bouncing Back When the Ground is Hard or
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Written by Bonnie Braun, Ph.D., CFCS
"Bouncing Back" or "Staying Afloat" describe what strong, stable families do in light of stress or trauma when they have the capacity for family, physical, spiritual and psychological renewal and recovery. In the research literature, bouncing back (or staying afloat) is called "resiliency."
The hard ground that is drought induced presents some farm and agriculturally-related families with perceived or real stresses ranging from mild and inconvenient to severe and crisis causing. The same can be said when floods force families to stay afloat and not go under. Some families are able to endure life's events with few adjustments. Some falter but do come back-like the children's toy, they "wabble but they don't fall down." And some fall prey to the situation and deteriorate.
In part the answer lies within the family and its condition when the challenge occurs. One classification of conditions affecting family functioning is shown in Figure 1.1
Figure 1 Classifications and Descriptions of Conditions
A family that is thriving when a triggering event occurs or the situation changes is in a better position to respond than a family at risk or already in crisis. So the first defense against challenging life events is to be strong and stable, able to fully function. Those with family businesses, either related to agricultural enterprises or not, must also assess the state of their businesses. A similar categorization is shown in Figure 2 to summarize some of the key characteristics of financial performance of farm businesses.2 Figure 2 Classifications of Businesses
Research shows that families with "resiliency" are able to adapt, to change in the face of risk factors. Risk factors are those hazards that increase the likelihood of a negative outcome for families. They may be biological, economic, social and psychosocial in nature. The economic hazards of reduced income and increased debt brought on by conditions like drought or flood are particularly challenging to farm families and agriculturally-related families. Figure 3 shows some risk factors that vary from normal transitions of life to catastrophic occurrences.
Figure 3 Examples of Occurrences
Family resiliency is the capacity of the family to retain, maintain or regain their ability to function after being challenged by expected events that arise in the course of family living and events that are unforeseen. Even the best of families are sometimes hard-put to adjust to and cope with the challenges that go beyond the ordinary stresses and strain that are part of family living over time. And, an event or series of events that pushes one family into a state of crisis, or a risk of crisis, may not do so to others. Or, given the timing of the event in the life cycle, the family may handle the triggering event differently. Why? In part, the answer lies within the family and in part, within the community or greater environment.3 Research shows that families with the most resiliency-or bounce-back-ability--have both protective and recovery factors sufficient to offset or overcome the triggering event.4 Protective Factors Protective factors mitigate the impact of the triggering event. They vary by race, ethnicity and social class. For example, Caucasian families often have more factors; African-American families have a more limited range and scope of factors; families with greater financial resources may have more options for handling a crisis requiring money. An understanding of which factors are most important for a family requires an understanding of which stage in which they are in the family life cycle. Stages include those of:
Stages of the life cycle affect both the experience of the family in handling crisis and the resources available. For example, a health crisis might be more manageable for some older empty nest/retirement families than for a family in the child bearing years. A financial crisis might be less manageable for those on a fixed income than those with the ability to increase income. For a couple just starting life together, they may lack the experience base upon which longer-term couples have to draw. Across the life cycle, research shows that the most prominent protective factors are:
Other factors that appear include:
If a family shares these factors going into challenges, they are more likely to have the elasticity and buoyancy needed to bounce back. That is, they have the ability to adapt. Recovery Factors Recovery factors are those which a family needs following a triggering event to regain family functioning. They include the ability to use the family's own resources and capabilities as a first response. The family may need to change patterns of function and, if possible, to change the adverse condition.
Again, research reveals several key factors:
General Factors Research also indicates there are general factors that are emerging
For families seeking to bounce back from the hard ground of the drought, or to stay afloat when flood waters come, an audit of their resiliency may be in order. By reviewing the above factors, they can take stock of what they have going for them. Where they are less than fully protected or stocked up on recovery and general factors, they may be ready for assistance from those in the community such as Cooperative Extension Educators who can support them as they find ways to regain stability and strengthen their families.5 Life has a way of bringing challenges to all who live long enough. For those families in agriculture, the next weather challenge could be continued drought, flood, fire, ice or snow. There could be government changes in zoning or regulations or family changes like turning over the operation to a new generation. The family that wants to stay in the business will need to find a way to balance family living and business operations such that it proves right the adage:
Roger Rubin, Ph.D., Professor,
Wesley Musser, Ph.D, Professor 1Brunner, Charles, "A Framework for Measuring the Potential of Comprehensive Service Strategies," in Young, N. et al. Making a Difference: Moving to Outcome-Based Accountabiity for Comprehensive Service Reforms. National Center for Service Integration., 1994, pp. 29-40. Return to top
2 Jolly, Robert W. "Understanding the Changing Farm Economy: A Guide for Social Service Providers," Iowa State University, l999. http://www.exnet.iastate.edu/Pages/communications/FarmFin2/1865.html 3Braun, B., Theobald ,R., & Stiliger, R. "Resilient Communities-Resilient families in the 21st Century," Journal of Family Consumer Sciences, June, l999, pp. 41-43. Return to top 4 McCubbin, H. et al, "Families Under Stress: What Makes Them Resilient," Journal of Family Consumer Sciences, Fall, l997, pp. 2-11. Return to top 5 McCoy. J. (Ed.)., "Family Resiliency: Building Strengths to meet Life's Challenges," Iowa State University Extension, l995. Return to top
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|